Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 234
Filtrar
1.
Sci Data ; 10(1): 348, 2023 06 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243476

RESUMEN

The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has put healthcare systems worldwide to their limits, resulting in increased waiting time for diagnosis and required medical assistance. With chest radiographs (CXR) being one of the most common COVID-19 diagnosis methods, many artificial intelligence tools for image-based COVID-19 detection have been developed, often trained on a small number of images from COVID-19-positive patients. Thus, the need for high-quality and well-annotated CXR image databases increased. This paper introduces POLCOVID dataset, containing chest X-ray (CXR) images of patients with COVID-19 or other-type pneumonia, and healthy individuals gathered from 15 Polish hospitals. The original radiographs are accompanied by the preprocessed images limited to the lung area and the corresponding lung masks obtained with the segmentation model. Moreover, the manually created lung masks are provided for a part of POLCOVID dataset and the other four publicly available CXR image collections. POLCOVID dataset can help in pneumonia or COVID-19 diagnosis, while the set of matched images and lung masks may serve for the development of lung segmentation solutions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , Radiografía Torácica , Rayos X , Humanos , Algoritmos , Inteligencia Artificial , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Prueba de COVID-19 , Neumonía , Polonia , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Comput Biol Med ; 159: 106962, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2316623

RESUMEN

Large chest X-rays (CXR) datasets have been collected to train deep learning models to detect thorax pathology on CXR. However, most CXR datasets are from single-center studies and the collected pathologies are often imbalanced. The aim of this study was to automatically construct a public, weakly-labeled CXR database from articles in PubMed Central Open Access (PMC-OA) and to assess model performance on CXR pathology classification by using this database as additional training data. Our framework includes text extraction, CXR pathology verification, subfigure separation, and image modality classification. We have extensively validated the utility of the automatically generated image database on thoracic disease detection tasks, including Hernia, Lung Lesion, Pneumonia, and pneumothorax. We pick these diseases due to their historically poor performance in existing datasets: the NIH-CXR dataset (112,120 CXR) and the MIMIC-CXR dataset (243,324 CXR). We find that classifiers fine-tuned with additional PMC-CXR extracted by the proposed framework consistently and significantly achieved better performance than those without (e.g., Hernia: 0.9335 vs 0.9154; Lung Lesion: 0.7394 vs. 0.7207; Pneumonia: 0.7074 vs. 0.6709; Pneumothorax 0.8185 vs. 0.7517, all in AUC with p< 0.0001) for CXR pathology detection. In contrast to previous approaches that manually submit the medical images to the repository, our framework can automatically collect figures and their accompanied figure legends. Compared to previous studies, the proposed framework improved subfigure segmentation and incorporates our advanced self-developed NLP technique for CXR pathology verification. We hope it complements existing resources and improves our ability to make biomedical image data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía , Neumotórax , Enfermedades Torácicas , Humanos , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Rayos X , Acceso a la Información , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 29(2): 373-378, 2023 03 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2255675

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether radiation exposure increased among different ages with chest computed tomography (CT) use during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Patients with chest CT scans in an 8-month period of the pandemic between March 15, 2020, and November 15, 2020, and the same period of the preceding year were included in the study. Indications of chest CT scans were obtained from the clinical notes and categorized as infectious diseases, neoplastic disorders, trauma, and other diseases. Chest CT scans for infectious diseases during the pandemic were compared with those with the same indications in 2019. The dose-length product values were obtained from the protocol screen individually. RESULTS: The total number of chest CT scans with an indication of infectious disease was 21746 in 2020 and 4318 in 2019. Total radiation exposure increased by 573% with the use of chest CT for infectious indications but decreased by 19% for neoplasia, 12% for trauma, and 43% for other reasons. The mean age of the patients scanned in 2019 was significantly higher than those scanned during the pandemic (64.6 vs. 50.3 years). A striking increase was seen in the 10-59 age group during the pandemic (P < 0.001). The highest increase was seen in the 20-29 age group, being 18.6 fold. One death was recorded per 58 chest CT scans during the pandemic. Chest CT use was substantially higher at the beginning of the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Chest CT was excessively used during the COVID-19 pandemic. Young and middle-aged people were exposed more than others. The impact of COVID-19-pandemic-related radiation exposure on public health should be followed carefully in future years.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Exposición a la Radiación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Pandemias , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(21): e26034, 2021 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2191014

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: To determine the role of ultra-low dose chest computed tomography (uld CT) compared to chest radiographs in patients with laboratory-confirmed early stage SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.Chest radiographs and uld CT of 12 consecutive suspected SARS-CoV-2 patients performed up to 48 hours from hospital admission were reviewed by 2 radiologists. Dosimetry and descriptive statistics of both modalities were analyzed.On uld CT, parenchymal abnormalities compatible with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were detected in 10/12 (83%) patients whereas on chest X-ray in, respectively, 8/12 (66%) and 5/12 (41%) patients for reader 1 and 2. The average increment of diagnostic performance of uld CT compared to chest X-ray was 29%. The average effective dose was, respectively, of 0.219 and 0.073 mSv.Uld CT detects substantially more lung injuries in symptomatic patients with suspected early stage SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia compared to chest radiographs, with a significantly better inter-reader agreement, at the cost of a slightly higher equivalent radiation dose.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/virología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Torácica/efectos adversos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Radiometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
5.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 21019, 2022 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2151106

RESUMEN

Spatial resolution in existing chest x-ray (CXR)-based scoring systems for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is low, and should be increased for better representation of anatomy, and severity of lung involvement. An existing CXR-based system, the Brixia score, was modified to increase the spatial resolution, creating the MBrixia score. The MBrixia score is the sum, of a rule-based quantification of CXR severity on a scale of 0 to 3 in 12 anatomical zones in the lungs. The MBrixia score was applied to CXR images from COVID-19 patients at a single tertiary hospital in the period May 4th-June 5th, 2020. The relationship between MBrixia score, and level of respiratory support at the time of performed CXR imaging was investigated. 37 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with 290 CXRs were identified, 22 (59.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit and 10 (27%) died during follow-up. In a Poisson regression using all 290 MBrixia scored CXRs, a higher MBrixia score was associated with a higher level of respiratory support at the time of performed CXR. The MBrixia score could potentially be valuable as a quantitative surrogate measurement of COVID-19 pneumonia severity, and future studies should investigate the score's validity and capabilities of predicting clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , SARS-CoV-2 , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Rayos X , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Korean J Radiol ; 21(10): 1150-1160, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2089785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of implementing a deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system for the interpretation of chest X-ray radiographs (CXR) of suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients and investigate the diagnostic performance of CXR interpretation with CAD assistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, initial CXR of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were investigated. A commercialized deep learning-based CAD system that can identify various abnormalities on CXR was implemented for the interpretation of CXR in daily practice. The diagnostic performance of radiologists with CAD assistance were evaluated based on two different reference standards: 1) real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) results for COVID-19 and 2) pulmonary abnormality suggesting pneumonia on chest CT. The turnaround times (TATs) of radiology reports for CXR and rRT-PCR results were also evaluated. RESULTS: Among 332 patients (male:female, 173:159; mean age, 57 years) with available rRT-PCR results, 16 patients (4.8%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Using CXR, radiologists with CAD assistance identified rRT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients with sensitivity and specificity of 68.8% and 66.7%, respectively. Among 119 patients (male:female, 75:44; mean age, 69 years) with available chest CTs, radiologists assisted by CAD reported pneumonia on CXR with a sensitivity of 81.5% and a specificity of 72.3%. The TATs of CXR reports were significantly shorter than those of rRT-PCR results (median 51 vs. 507 minutes; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radiologists with CAD assistance could identify patients with rRT-PCR-positive COVID-19 or pneumonia on CXR with a reasonably acceptable performance. In patients suspected with COVID-19, CXR had much faster TATs than rRT-PCRs.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Aprendizaje Profundo , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
7.
PLoS One ; 17(10): e0274098, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2054336

RESUMEN

In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, recent research has proposed creating deep learning based models that use chest radiographs (CXRs) in a variety of clinical tasks to help manage the crisis. However, the size of existing datasets of CXRs from COVID-19+ patients are relatively small, and researchers often pool CXR data from multiple sources, for example, using different x-ray machines in various patient populations under different clinical scenarios. Deep learning models trained on such datasets have been shown to overfit to erroneous features instead of learning pulmonary characteristics in a phenomenon known as shortcut learning. We propose adding feature disentanglement to the training process. This technique forces the models to identify pulmonary features from the images and penalizes them for learning features that can discriminate between the original datasets that the images come from. We find that models trained in this way indeed have better generalization performance on unseen data; in the best case we found that it improved AUC by 0.13 on held out data. We further find that this outperforms masking out non-lung parts of the CXRs and performing histogram equalization, both of which are recently proposed methods for removing biases in CXR datasets.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Rayos X
8.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 1289221, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2020467

RESUMEN

As an epidemic, COVID-19's core test instrument still has serious flaws. To improve the present condition, all capabilities and tools available in this field are being used to combat the pandemic. Because of the contagious characteristics of the unique coronavirus (COVID-19) infection, an overwhelming comparison with patients queues up for pulmonary X-rays, overloading physicians and radiology and significantly impacting the quality of care, diagnosis, and outbreak prevention. Given the scarcity of clinical services such as intensive care and motorized ventilation systems in the aspect of this vastly transmissible ailment, it is critical to categorize patients as per their risk categories. This research describes a novel use of the deep convolutional neural network (CNN) technique to COVID-19 illness assessment seriousness. Utilizing chest X-ray images as contribution, an unsupervised DCNN model is constructed and suggested to split COVID-19 individuals into four seriousness classrooms: low, medium, serious, and crucial with an accuracy level of 96 percent. The efficiency of the DCNN model developed with the proposed methodology is demonstrated by empirical findings on a suitably huge sum of chest X-ray scans. To the evidence relating, it is the first COVID-19 disease incidence evaluation research with four different phases, to use a reasonably high number of X-ray images dataset and a DCNN with nearly all hyperparameters dynamically adjusted by the variable selection optimization task.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , Algoritmos , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Radiografía Torácica/métodos
9.
Comput Intell Neurosci ; 2022: 7474304, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1978592

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a worldwide catastrophe and widespread devastation that reeled almost all countries. The pandemic has mounted pressure on the existing healthcare system and caused panic and desperation. The gold testing standard for COVID-19 detection, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), has shown its limitations with 70% accuracy, contributing to the incorrect diagnosis that exaggerated the complexities and increased the fatalities. The new variations further pose unseen challenges in terms of their diagnosis and subsequent treatment. The COVID-19 virus heavily impacts the lungs and fills the air sacs with fluid causing pneumonia. Thus, chest X-ray inspection is a viable option if the inspection detects COVID-19-induced pneumonia, hence confirming the exposure of COVID-19. Artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques are capable of examining chest X-rays in order to detect patterns that can confirm the presence of COVID-19-induced pneumonia. This research used CNN and deep learning techniques to detect COVID-19-induced pneumonia from chest X-rays. Transfer learning with fine-tuning ensures that the proposed work successfully classifies COVID-19-induced pneumonia, regular pneumonia, and normal conditions. Xception, Visual Geometry Group 16, and Visual Geometry Group 19 are used to realize transfer learning. The experimental results were promising in terms of precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, false omission rate, false negative rate, false positive rate, and false discovery rate with a COVID-19-induced pneumonia detection accuracy of 98%. Experimental results also revealed that the proposed work has not only correctly identified COVID-19 exposure but also made a distinction between COVID-19-induced pneumonia and regular pneumonia, as the latter is a very common disease, while COVID-19 is more lethal. These results mitigated the concern and overlap in the diagnosis of COVID-19-induced pneumonia and regular pneumonia. With further integrations, it can be employed as a potential standard model in differentiating the various lung-related infections, including COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , Neumonía , Inteligencia Artificial , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/métodos
10.
Pediatr Radiol ; 52(8): 1568-1580, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1976805

RESUMEN

Most artificial intelligence (AI) studies have focused primarily on adult imaging, with less attention to the unique aspects of pediatric imaging. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify all publicly available pediatric datasets and determine their potential utility and limitations for pediatric AI studies and (2) systematically review the literature to assess the current state of AI in pediatric chest radiograph interpretation. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase to retrieve all studies from 1990 to 2021 that assessed AI for pediatric chest radiograph interpretation and abstracted the datasets used to train and test AI algorithms, approaches and performance metrics. Of 29 publicly available chest radiograph datasets, 2 datasets included solely pediatric chest radiographs, and 7 datasets included pediatric and adult patients. We identified 55 articles that implemented an AI model to interpret pediatric chest radiographs or pediatric and adult chest radiographs. Classification of chest radiographs as pneumonia was the most common application of AI, evaluated in 65% of the studies. Although many studies report high diagnostic accuracy, most algorithms were not validated on external datasets. Most AI studies for pediatric chest radiograph interpretation have focused on a limited number of diseases, and progress is hindered by a lack of large-scale pediatric chest radiograph datasets.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Neumonía , Adulto , Algoritmos , Niño , Humanos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(29): e29587, 2022 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1961224

RESUMEN

To tune and test the generalizability of a deep learning-based model for assessment of COVID-19 lung disease severity on chest radiographs (CXRs) from different patient populations. A published convolutional Siamese neural network-based model previously trained on hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was tuned using 250 outpatient CXRs. This model produces a quantitative measure of COVID-19 lung disease severity (pulmonary x-ray severity (PXS) score). The model was evaluated on CXRs from 4 test sets, including 3 from the United States (patients hospitalized at an academic medical center (N = 154), patients hospitalized at a community hospital (N = 113), and outpatients (N = 108)) and 1 from Brazil (patients at an academic medical center emergency department (N = 303)). Radiologists from both countries independently assigned reference standard CXR severity scores, which were correlated with the PXS scores as a measure of model performance (Pearson R). The Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) technique was used to visualize the neural network results. Tuning the deep learning model with outpatient data showed high model performance in 2 United States hospitalized patient datasets (R = 0.88 and R = 0.90, compared to baseline R = 0.86). Model performance was similar, though slightly lower, when tested on the United States outpatient and Brazil emergency department datasets (R = 0.86 and R = 0.85, respectively). UMAP showed that the model learned disease severity information that generalized across test sets. A deep learning model that extracts a COVID-19 severity score on CXRs showed generalizable performance across multiple populations from 2 continents, including outpatients and hospitalized patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Pulmón , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Radiólogos
12.
Radiology ; 305(2): 454-465, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1950321

RESUMEN

Background Developing deep learning models for radiology requires large data sets and substantial computational resources. Data set size limitations can be further exacerbated by distribution shifts, such as rapid changes in patient populations and standard of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. A common partial mitigation is transfer learning by pretraining a "generic network" on a large nonmedical data set and then fine-tuning on a task-specific radiology data set. Purpose To reduce data set size requirements for chest radiography deep learning models by using an advanced machine learning approach (supervised contrastive [SupCon] learning) to generate chest radiography networks. Materials and Methods SupCon helped generate chest radiography networks from 821 544 chest radiographs from India and the United States. The chest radiography networks were used as a starting point for further machine learning model development for 10 prediction tasks (eg, airspace opacity, fracture, tuberculosis, and COVID-19 outcomes) by using five data sets comprising 684 955 chest radiographs from India, the United States, and China. Three model development setups were tested (linear classifier, nonlinear classifier, and fine-tuning the full network) with different data set sizes from eight to 85. Results Across a majority of tasks, compared with transfer learning from a nonmedical data set, SupCon reduced label requirements up to 688-fold and improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) at matching data set sizes. At the extreme low-data regimen, training small nonlinear models by using only 45 chest radiographs yielded an AUC of 0.95 (noninferior to radiologist performance) in classifying microbiology-confirmed tuberculosis in external validation. At a more moderate data regimen, training small nonlinear models by using only 528 chest radiographs yielded an AUC of 0.75 in predicting severe COVID-19 outcomes. Conclusion Supervised contrastive learning enabled performance comparable to state-of-the-art deep learning models in multiple clinical tasks by using as few as 45 images and is a promising method for predictive modeling with use of small data sets and for predicting outcomes in shifting patient populations. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , Humanos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Pandemias , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiografía , Aprendizaje Automático
13.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265691, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1910563

RESUMEN

Automatic detection of some pulmonary abnormalities using chest X-rays may be impacted adversely due to obscuring by bony structures like the ribs and the clavicles. Automated bone suppression methods would increase soft tissue visibility and enhance automated disease detection. We evaluate this hypothesis using a custom ensemble of convolutional neural network models, which we call DeBoNet, that suppresses bones in frontal CXRs. First, we train and evaluate variants of U-Nets, Feature Pyramid Networks, and other proposed custom models using a private collection of CXR images and their bone-suppressed counterparts. The DeBoNet, constructed using the top-3 performing models, outperformed the individual models in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) (36.7977±1.6207), multi-scale structural similarity index measure (MS-SSIM) (0.9848±0.0073), and other metrics. Next, the best-performing bone-suppression model is applied to CXR images that are pooled from several sources, showing no abnormality and other findings consistent with COVID-19. The impact of bone suppression is demonstrated by evaluating the gain in performance in detecting pulmonary abnormality consistent with COVID-19 disease. We observe that the model trained on bone-suppressed CXRs (MCC: 0.9645, 95% confidence interval (0.9510, 0.9780)) significantly outperformed (p < 0.05) the model trained on non-bone-suppressed images (MCC: 0.7961, 95% confidence interval (0.7667, 0.8255)) in detecting findings consistent with COVID-19 indicating benefits derived from automatic bone suppression on disease classification. The code is available at https://github.com/sivaramakrishnan-rajaraman/Bone-Suppresion-Ensemble.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Clavícula/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Costillas/diagnóstico por imagen , Relación Señal-Ruido
14.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 6596, 2022 04 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1908269

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted healthcare systems across the world. Chest radiography (CXR) can be used as a complementary method for diagnosing/following COVID-19 patients. However, experience level and workload of technicians and radiologists may affect the decision process. Recent studies suggest that deep learning can be used to assess CXRs, providing an important second opinion for radiologists and technicians in the decision process, and super-human performance in detection of COVID-19 has been reported in multiple studies. In this study, the clinical applicability of deep learning systems for COVID-19 screening was assessed by testing the performance of deep learning systems for the detection of COVID-19. Specifically, four datasets were used: (1) a collection of multiple public datasets (284.793 CXRs); (2) BIMCV dataset (16.631 CXRs); (3) COVIDGR (852 CXRs) and 4) a private dataset (6.361 CXRs). All datasets were collected retrospectively and consist of only frontal CXR views. A ResNet-18 was trained on each of the datasets for the detection of COVID-19. It is shown that a high dataset bias was present, leading to high performance in intradataset train-test scenarios (area under the curve 0.55-0.84 on the collection of public datasets). Significantly lower performances were obtained in interdataset train-test scenarios however (area under the curve > 0.98). A subset of the data was then assessed by radiologists for comparison to the automatic systems. Finetuning with radiologist annotations significantly increased performance across datasets (area under the curve 0.61-0.88) and improved the attention on clinical findings in positive COVID-19 CXRs. Nevertheless, tests on CXRs from different hospital services indicate that the screening performance of CXR and automatic systems is limited (area under the curve < 0.6 on emergency service CXRs). However, COVID-19 manifestations can be accurately detected when present, motivating the use of these tools for evaluating disease progression on mild to severe COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Radiografía , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Radiol Clin North Am ; 60(3): 371-381, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1895404

RESUMEN

The chest radiograph is the most common imaging examination performed in most radiology departments, and one of the more common indications for these studies is suspected infection. Radiologists must therefore be aware of less common radiographic patterns of pulmonary infection if they are to add value in the interpretation of chest radiographs for this indication. This review uses a case-based format to illustrate a range of imaging findings that can be associated with acute pulmonary infection and highlight findings that should prompt investigation for diseases other than community-acquired pneumonia to prevent misdiagnosis and delays in appropriate management.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Radiografía Torácica/métodos
16.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform ; 26(8): 4032-4043, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1865064

RESUMEN

The pandemic of COVID-19 has become a global crisis in public health, which has led to a massive number of deaths and severe economic degradation. To suppress the spread of COVID-19, accurate diagnosis at an early stage is crucial. As the popularly used real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) swab test can be lengthy and inaccurate, chest screening with radiography imaging is still preferred. However, due to limited image data and the difficulty of the early-stage diagnosis, existing models suffer from ineffective feature extraction and poor network convergence and optimisation. To tackle these issues, a segmentation-based COVID-19 classification network, namely SC2Net, is proposed for effective detection of the COVID-19 from chest x-ray (CXR) images. The SC2Net consists of two subnets: a COVID-19 lung segmentation network (CLSeg), and a spatial attention network (SANet). In order to supress the interference from the background, the CLSeg is first applied to segment the lung region from the CXR. The segmented lung region is then fed to the SANet for classification and diagnosis of the COVID-19. As a shallow yet effective classifier, SANet takes the ResNet-18 as the feature extractor and enhances high-level feature via the proposed spatial attention module. For performance evaluation, the COVIDGR 1.0 dataset is used, which is a high-quality dataset with various severity levels of the COVID-19. Experimental results have shown that, our SC2Net has an average accuracy of 84.23% and an average F1 score of 81.31% in detection of COVID-19, outperforming several state-of-the-art approaches.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Algoritmos , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Rayos X
17.
ISA Trans ; 124: 82-89, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851356

RESUMEN

Testing is one of the important methodologies used by various countries in order to fight against COVID-19 infection. The infection is considered as one of the deadliest ones although the mortality rate is not very high. COVID-19 infection is being caused by SARS-CoV2 which is termed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus. To prevent the community, transfer among the masses, testing plays an important role. Efficient and quicker testing techniques helps in identification of infected person which makes it easier for to isolate the patient. Deep learning methods have proved their presence and effectiveness in medical image analysis and in the identification of some of the diseases like pneumonia. Authors have been proposed a deep learning mechanism and system to identify the COVID-19 infected patient on analyzing the X-ray images. Symptoms in the COVID-19 infection is well similar to the symptoms occurring in the influenza and pneumonia. The proposed model Inception Nasnet (INASNET) is being able to separate out and classify the X-ray images in the corresponding normal, COVID-19 infected or pneumonia infected classes. This testing method will be a boom for the doctors and for the state as it is a way cheaper method as compared to the other testing kits used by the healthcare workers for the diagnosis of the disease. Continuous analysis by convolutional neural network and regular evaluation will result in better accuracy and helps in eliminating the false-negative results. INASNET is based on the combined platform of InceptionNet and Neural network architecture search which will result in having higher and faster predictions. Regular testing, faster results, economically viable testing using X-ray images will help the front line workers to make a win over COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aprendizaje Profundo , Neumonía , Algoritmos , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , ARN Viral , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Rayos X
18.
Tomography ; 8(3): 1221-1227, 2022 04 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1810207

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of traditional chest X-ray (CXR) and digital tomosynthesis (DTS) compared to computed tomography (CT) in detecting pulmonary interstitial changes in patients having recovered from severe COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study, and received local ethics committee approval. Patients suspected of having COVID-19 pneumonia upon emergency department admission between 1 March and 31 August 2020, and who underwent CXR followed by DTS and CT, were considered. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection proven by a positive RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs performed upon admission to the hospital, and with complete clinical recovery; (2) a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS, according to the Berlin criteria, during hospitalization; (3) no recent history of other lung disease; and (4) complete imaging follow-up by CXR, DTS, and CT for at least 6 months and up to one year. Analysis of DTS images was carried out independently by two radiologists with 16 and 10 years of experience in chest imaging, respectively. The following findings were evaluated: (1) ground-glass opacities (GGOs); (2) air-space consolidations with or without air bronchogram; (3) reticulations; and (4) linear consolidation. Indicators of diagnostic performance of RX and digital tomosynthesis were calculated using CT as a reference. All data were analyzed using R statistical software (version 4.0.2, 2020). RESULTS: Out of 44 patients initially included, 25 patients (17 M/8 F), with a mean age of 64 years (standard deviation (SD): 12), met the criteria and were included. The overall average numbers of findings confirmed by CT were GGOs in 11 patients, lung consolidations in 8 patients, 7 lung interstitial reticulations, and linear consolidation in 20 patients. DTS showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared to CXR in recognizing interstitial lung abnormalities-especially GGOs (p = 0.0412) and linear consolidations (p = 0.0009). The average dose for chest X-ray was 0.10 mSv (0.07-0.32), for DTS was 1.03 mSv (0.74-2.00), and for CT scan was 3 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, DTS possesses a high diagnostic accuracy, compared with CXR, in revealing lung fibrotic changes in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fibrosis Pulmonar , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , SARS-CoV-2
19.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 658, 2021 Sep 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1770502

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whilst the impact of Covid-19 infection in pregnant women has been examined, there is a scarcity of data on pregnant women in the Middle East. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the impact of Covid-19 infection on pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates population. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out to compare the clinical course and outcome of pregnancy in 79 pregnant women with Covid-19 and 85 non-pregnant women with Covid-19 admitted to Latifa Hospital in Dubai between March and June 2020. RESULTS: Although Pregnant women presented with fewer symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, and shortness of breath compared to non-pregnant women; yet they ran a much more severe course of illness. On admission, 12/79 (15.2%) Vs 2/85 (2.4%) had a chest radiograph score [on a scale 1-6] of ≥3 (p-value = 0.0039). On discharge, 6/79 (7.6%) Vs 1/85 (1.2%) had a score ≥3 (p-value = 0.0438). They also had much higher levels of laboratory indicators of severity with values above reference ranges for C-Reactive Protein [(28 (38.3%) Vs 13 (17.6%)] with p < 0.004; and for D-dimer [32 (50.8%) Vs 3(6%)]; with p < 0.001. They required more ICU admissions: 10/79 (12.6%) Vs 1/85 (1.2%) with p=0.0036; and suffered more complications: 9/79 (11.4%) Vs 1/85 (1.2%) with p=0.0066; of Covid-19 infection, particularly in late pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women presented with fewer Covid-19 symptoms but ran a much more severe course of illness compared to non-pregnant women with the disease. They had worse chest radiograph scores and much higher levels of laboratory indicators of disease severity. They had more ICU admissions and suffered more complications of Covid-19 infection, such as risk for miscarriage and preterm deliveries. Pregnancy with Covid-19 infection, could, therefore, be categorised as high-risk pregnancy and requires management by an obstetric and medical multidisciplinary team.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Radiografía Torácica , Evaluación de Síntomas , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/transmisión , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Masculino , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Radiografía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/estadística & datos numéricos , Emiratos Árabes Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Radiology ; 295(3): 200463, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1723927

RESUMEN

In this retrospective study, chest CTs of 121 symptomatic patients infected with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) from four centers in China from January 18, 2020 to February 2, 2020 were reviewed for common CT findings in relationship to the time between symptom onset and the initial CT scan (i.e. early, 0-2 days (36 patients), intermediate 3-5 days (33 patients), late 6-12 days (25 patients)). The hallmarks of COVID-19 infection on imaging were bilateral and peripheral ground-glass and consolidative pulmonary opacities. Notably, 20/36 (56%) of early patients had a normal CT. With a longer time after the onset of symptoms, CT findings were more frequent, including consolidation, bilateral and peripheral disease, greater total lung involvement, linear opacities, "crazy-paving" pattern and the "reverse halo" sign. Bilateral lung involvement was observed in 10/36 early patients (28%), 25/33 intermediate patients (76%), and 22/25 late patients (88%).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/virología , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/virología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA